Comments on: Chernobyl Power Plant - the real purpose http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html All about Delphi, C++, PHP, Adsense, Captcha, Internet, Technology Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:26:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: Napka’s Top Science » Chernobyl Power Plant - the real purpose http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-868 Napka’s Top Science » Chernobyl Power Plant - the real purpose Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:37:33 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-868 [...] read more | digg story [...] […] read more | digg story […]

]]> By: borg http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1107 borg Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:03:01 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1107 Obviously, you have no idea what "kW" and "MW" means. Your calculations are totally wrong. Obviously, you have no idea what “kW” and “MW” means. Your calculations are totally wrong.

]]> By: Mat http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1462 Mat Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:10:30 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1462 borg, obviously you are a stupid reatrd if you think these calculations are wrong. Google it: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=1000KW+to+MW borg, obviously you are a stupid reatrd if you think these calculations are wrong. Google it: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=1000KW+to+MW

]]> By: Wrapper http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1510 Wrapper Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:25:21 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1510 Mat, The Chernobyl plant had 4 RBMK-1000 blocks, each delivering 1000 MW (=1GW), thus a total of 4000 MW. Google it. The text above states that "Each of them could generate about… 1000 KW (1 MW)." - this should read "Each of them could generate about… 1000 MW (1 GW)." Mat, The Chernobyl plant had 4 RBMK-1000 blocks, each delivering 1000 MW (=1GW), thus a total of 4000 MW. Google it.

The text above states that “Each of them could generate about… 1000 KW (1 MW).” - this should read “Each of them could generate about… 1000 MW (1 GW).”

]]> By: Mike http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1615 Mike Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:34:36 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1615 Yes, that is what is correct. I remember when this tragic moment took place. I think people there are still effected by this event. Nice post, thank you!. Best, Mike <a href="http://www.livedomainsearch.com" rel="nofollow">instant host, domain name and whois search tool </a> Yes, that is what is correct. I remember when this tragic moment took place. I think people there are still effected by this event.

Nice post, thank you!.

Best, Mike

instant host, domain name and whois search tool

]]> By: Mike http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1616 Mike Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:36:23 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1616 I must say the sat photos look amazing, thanks again. I must say the sat photos look amazing, thanks again.

]]> By: Vladi http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1660 Vladi Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:11:14 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1660 Atentado Chernobyl... http://images.google.es/imgres?imgurl=http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/data/duga-3/antennas.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html&h=740&w=1087&sz=118&hl=es&start=11&um=1&tbnid=5Gxbed3oT6gsVM:&tbnh=102&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dduga%2B3%26um%3D1%26hl%3Des Atentado Chernobyl…

http://images.google.es/imgres?imgurl=http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/data/duga-3/antennas.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html&h=740&w=1087&sz=118&hl=es&start=11&um=1&tbnid=5Gxbed3oT6gsVM:&tbnh=102&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dduga%2B3%26um%3D1%26hl%3Des

]]> By: Ari http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1839 Ari Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:41:23 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1839 Where this 'fact' of DUGA-3 requiring 4000MW of power is coming from? Any sitate or something? I am interested what is really truth. It is huge system and I am not antenna-expert but 4000MW sounds however just magnifient :) Where this ‘fact’ of DUGA-3 requiring 4000MW of power is coming from? Any sitate or something? I am interested what is really truth. It is huge system and I am not antenna-expert but 4000MW sounds however just magnifient :)

]]> By: Ari http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1840 Ari Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:41:44 +0000 http://www.techblog.tomksoft.com/uncategorized/chernobyl-power-plant-the-real-purpose.html#comment-1840 Where this 'fact' of DUGA-3 requiring 4000MW of power is coming from? Any sitate or something? I am interested what is really truth. It is huge system and I am not antenna-expert but 4000MW sounds however just magnificent :) Where this ‘fact’ of DUGA-3 requiring 4000MW of power is coming from? Any sitate or something? I am interested what is really truth. It is huge system and I am not antenna-expert but 4000MW sounds however just magnificent :)

]]>